Skip to main content


Facts the Historians Leave Out: The Youth's Confederate Primer by John S. Tilley

Facts the Historians Leave Out: 
The Youth's Confederate Primer
John S. Tilley


Was the War of the Sixties Fought Over the Issue of Slavery? 

Did the North fight the war to free the slaves? That is a fair question. Maybe, you have come to believe that such a motive inspired the terrible struggle. But, was that the cause? Of all the leaders of that period, who do you think best qualified to know the true answer? Would not it have been Abraham Lincoln? And, what do we learn from him? He had served in Congress with Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia. On December 22, 1860, just two days after South Carolina left the Union, he wrote to Mr. Stephens: “Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican administration would, directly or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as 8 once a friend, and still, I hope, not an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears.” On the next fourth of March, he became President. Had he changed his mind? Just after he took the oath of office, he said in his inaugural address: “I declare that I have no intention, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” Not only that. In 1862, when the war had been in progress for more than a year, Republican senators urged him to take action to free the slaves. He answered: “Gentlemen, I can’t do it.... But I’ll tell you what I can do; I can resign in favor of Mr. Hamlin. Perhaps Mr. Hamlin could do it.” There is the record. Was Mr. Lincoln, then, in favor of slavery? He was not. He believed it to be wrong and was opposed to allowing it to expand into new States; but, he thought he had no right to interfere with it in the States in which it already existed.  


Did the Southern Armies Fight to Preserve Slavery? 

Robert E. Lee was the South’s leading General. Not only had he freed the slaves under his control, but he had declared that slavery was “a moral and political evil.” It was his view that “the best men in the South” opposed the system, and that they would welcome a sane movement to be rid of it. He was convinced that, in time, “the mild and melting influence of Christianity,” rather than war, would solve the problem. Stonewall Jackson agreed with Lee’s view. He wished to see the shackles struck from every slave. So, clearly, these great leaders of the Confederates were not fighting to retain a system which they hated. What of the soldiers who marched behind Lee and Jackson? Bear in mind that only one in fifteen of 10 Southern whites ever owned a slave. All in all, there were fewer than 350,000 Southern slave-owners. But there were some 600,000 soldiers in the Confederate armies. So, if all the slave-owners were in uniform — and, certainly, they were not — this still leaves several hundred thousand soldiers with no personal interest in slavery. What were these non-slaveholders fighting for? You have read of John Brown who defied the law, attacked and occupied the armory at Harper’s Ferry. He was captured by United States Army forces led by a Virginia Colonel by the name of Robert E. Lee. His execution took place in Virginia, a State presided over by Governor Henry A. Wise. It may interest you to learn that, not only the Virginia Colonel and the Virginia Governor, but a majority of the people of Virginia were then sincerely opposed to slavery. Southern opposition to slavery was not something new. Daniel Webster once declared that the leading spirits of the South regarded it as “an evil, a blight, a scourge, and a curse.” He might have called the roll, a roll including such names as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, John Randolph, and George Mason. 

John S. Tilley, Facts the Historians Leave Out (Montgomery, Ala.: The Paragon Press, 1951), 7-10.


Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Confederate Battle Flag

Origin of the Confederate Battle Flag

[The facts concerning the origin of the battle flag contained in this article are derived from a speech by General Beauregard before a special meeting of Louisiana Division, Army of Northern Virginia Association, December 6, 1878.—EDITOR.]
This banner, the witness and inspiration of many victories, which was proudly borne on every field from enemy. General Beauregard was momentarily expecting help from the right, and the uncertainty and anxiety of this hour amounted to anguish.
Still the column pressed on. Calling a staff officer, General Beauregard instructed him to go at once to General Johnston, at the Lewis house, and say that the enemy were receiving heavy re-enforcements, that the troops on the plateau were very much scattered, and that he would be compelled to retire to the Lewis house and there reform hoping that the troops ordered up from the right would arrive in time to enable him to establish and hold the new line.
Meanwhile, the unknown t…

Was the War Between the States Fought Over Slavery? By Dr. Richard Lee Montgomery

Was the War Between the States Fought Over Slavery? By Dr. Richard Lee Montgomery

True or false? Abraham Lincoln gave us the answer. When asked in March of 1861 by a newspaper reporter at a Virginia Compromise Delegation, “Why not let the South go?” Abraham Lincoln replied, “Let the South go? Let the South go! Where then shall we gain our revenues?” 1 Why would President Lincoln say such a thing? Well, it’s because he was alluding to the fact that the South paid 85 percent of the tax (Tariffs) burden of the nation. Lincoln sensed total financial ruin for the North so he waged war on the South.
In fact, the notion that the war was fought over slavery is so far from the truth and yet this interpretation has taught so many generations a deceptive lie. Even across the Atlantic Ocean in England, Charles Dickens, in 1862 said, “The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states. Secession by …

Julia Ward Howe and the Battle Hymn of the Republic by Dr. Richard Lee Montgomery

Julia Ward Howe and the Battle Hymn of the Republic by  Dr. Richard Lee Montgomery
For more than 150 years there has been a concerted, consistent teaching of the Northern Yankee interpretation, of what they call the “Civil War.” This effort has been met with great success. In the 1845 Noah Webster’s Dictionary, there are two words that we need to re-familiarize ourselves with: “➀ Propagandism: The art or practice of propagating tenets or principles. ➁ Propagandist: A person who devotes himself to the spread of any system of principles.” 1 This is what has taken place for these past 150 plus years. The practice of propagating tenets or principles of this so called Civil War. After all, we know well, to the victor, they have the privilege to interpret the history of this brutal war. They tell us they were the good guys.
From the book entitled “Famous Leaders Among Women,” published in 1895, we are told that “Julia Ward Howe has used her high social position and brilliant talents for the goo…