Skip to main content


Facts the Historians Leave Out: The Youth's Confederate Primer by John S. Tilley

Facts the Historians Leave Out: 
The Youth's Confederate Primer
John S. Tilley


Was the War of the Sixties Fought Over the Issue of Slavery? 

Did the North fight the war to free the slaves? That is a fair question. Maybe, you have come to believe that such a motive inspired the terrible struggle. But, was that the cause? Of all the leaders of that period, who do you think best qualified to know the true answer? Would not it have been Abraham Lincoln? And, what do we learn from him? He had served in Congress with Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia. On December 22, 1860, just two days after South Carolina left the Union, he wrote to Mr. Stephens: “Do the people of the South really entertain fears that a Republican administration would, directly or indirectly, interfere with their slaves, or with them about their slaves? If they do, I wish to assure you, as 8 once a friend, and still, I hope, not an enemy, that there is no cause for such fears.” On the next fourth of March, he became President. Had he changed his mind? Just after he took the oath of office, he said in his inaugural address: “I declare that I have no intention, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” Not only that. In 1862, when the war had been in progress for more than a year, Republican senators urged him to take action to free the slaves. He answered: “Gentlemen, I can’t do it.... But I’ll tell you what I can do; I can resign in favor of Mr. Hamlin. Perhaps Mr. Hamlin could do it.” There is the record. Was Mr. Lincoln, then, in favor of slavery? He was not. He believed it to be wrong and was opposed to allowing it to expand into new States; but, he thought he had no right to interfere with it in the States in which it already existed.  


Did the Southern Armies Fight to Preserve Slavery? 

Robert E. Lee was the South’s leading General. Not only had he freed the slaves under his control, but he had declared that slavery was “a moral and political evil.” It was his view that “the best men in the South” opposed the system, and that they would welcome a sane movement to be rid of it. He was convinced that, in time, “the mild and melting influence of Christianity,” rather than war, would solve the problem. Stonewall Jackson agreed with Lee’s view. He wished to see the shackles struck from every slave. So, clearly, these great leaders of the Confederates were not fighting to retain a system which they hated. What of the soldiers who marched behind Lee and Jackson? Bear in mind that only one in fifteen of 10 Southern whites ever owned a slave. All in all, there were fewer than 350,000 Southern slave-owners. But there were some 600,000 soldiers in the Confederate armies. So, if all the slave-owners were in uniform — and, certainly, they were not — this still leaves several hundred thousand soldiers with no personal interest in slavery. What were these non-slaveholders fighting for? You have read of John Brown who defied the law, attacked and occupied the armory at Harper’s Ferry. He was captured by United States Army forces led by a Virginia Colonel by the name of Robert E. Lee. His execution took place in Virginia, a State presided over by Governor Henry A. Wise. It may interest you to learn that, not only the Virginia Colonel and the Virginia Governor, but a majority of the people of Virginia were then sincerely opposed to slavery. Southern opposition to slavery was not something new. Daniel Webster once declared that the leading spirits of the South regarded it as “an evil, a blight, a scourge, and a curse.” He might have called the roll, a roll including such names as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, John Randolph, and George Mason. 

John S. Tilley, Facts the Historians Leave Out (Montgomery, Ala.: The Paragon Press, 1951), 7-10.


Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the Confederate Battle Flag

Origin of the Confederate Battle Flag

[The facts concerning the origin of the battle flag contained in this article are derived from a speech by General Beauregard before a special meeting of Louisiana Division, Army of Northern Virginia Association, December 6, 1878.—EDITOR.]
This banner, the witness and inspiration of many victories, which was proudly borne on every field from enemy. General Beauregard was momentarily expecting help from the right, and the uncertainty and anxiety of this hour amounted to anguish.
Still the column pressed on. Calling a staff officer, General Beauregard instructed him to go at once to General Johnston, at the Lewis house, and say that the enemy were receiving heavy re-enforcements, that the troops on the plateau were very much scattered, and that he would be compelled to retire to the Lewis house and there reform hoping that the troops ordered up from the right would arrive in time to enable him to establish and hold the new line.
Meanwhile, the unknown t…

Some Truths of History (I) by Thaddeus Kosciusko Oglesby

SOME TRUTHS OF HISTORY:  A Vindication of the South Against the Encyclopedia Britannica and Other Maligners by Thaddeus Kosciusko Oglesby
Since the Evolution days the few thinkers of America born south of Mason and Dixon's line — out-numbered by those belonging to the single State of Massachusetts — have commonly migrated to New York or Boston in search of a university training. In the world of letters, at least, the Southern States have shone by reflected light; nor is it too much to say that mainly by their connection with the North the Carolinas have been saved from sinking to the level of Mexico or the Antilles. Like the Spartan marshaling his helots, the planter lounging among his slaves was made dead to art. It has only flourished freely in a free soil, and for almost all its vitality and aspirations we must turn to New England." — Encyclopedia Britannica {ninth edition), Volume 1, p. 719. 
If the sons and daughters of the South do not themselves uphold the truth of histor…

Confederate & Union Soldiers Had Slaves Compiled by Dr. Richard Lee Montgomery

Confederate & Union Soldiers Had Slaves Compiled by Dr. Richard Lee Montgomery
“They do not tell that General Grant, a slaveholder, was put as leader of the Northern Army and General Lee, who had freed his slaves, as the leader of the Southern Army, but they do say that the war was fought to hold the slaves yet do not tell that only 200,000 slaveholders were in the Southern Army, while 315,000 slaveholders were in the Northern Army.” Mildred Lewis Rutherford, Truths of History: A Fair, Unbiased, Impartial, Unprejudiced and Conscientious Study of History. Object: To Secure a Peaceful Settlement of the Many Perplexing Questions Now Causing Contention Between the North and the South (Athens, Georgia, 1920), iv.

By Fannie Eoline Selph: “The War between the States was not caused by the question of the emancipation of the slaves, nor did it begin with the firing on Fort Sumter. The cause and its declaration centered in the order issued by Abraham Lincoln for 2,400 men and 265 guns for the de…